If you are a property owner that is considering monetizing your wireless lease rents or an institutional investor trying to determine the value of lease/easement cash flows under wireless infrastructure, information on street-level, market pricing is not readily available to you. Our Market Data section provides current, real-time insight into the market that could be of use to you as you weigh your options or undertake due diligence.
The various firms that offer to purchase wireless leases from property owners are motivated to do so as cheaply as possible. Having information on current lease offer trends is imperative and TCA is the only firm to publish them. Knowing how much an asset is really worth in today’s market is a must for a Seller. If you would like to maximize your price as a Seller or be sure you aren’t over-paying as a portfolio Buyer, reference the quarterly updated data provided in the tables below at TowerCapAdvisors.com or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org for more information today.
3/31/17 Update: Average Offer price for wireless leases by carrier stats updated – Commentary: Q1 – 2017
TCA analysts track (confidentially) the offers for wireless leases made by aggregation firms to property owners that contact us, subsequent offers for the same assets from TCA and the overall trend of value for the leases in the industry. Based on a review of Q4, 2016 and Q1 2017 trailing 6 month offer data by the aggregators (buyers) of wireless leases, we have distilled the following data and trends:
Note: Averages are calculated by TCA from discussions with both site owners and industry personnel and are normalized for perpetual purchase terms and 3% per year (or 15% per Term) escalations. Lower escalators would result in lower offer prices. Higher annual escalators could result in higher than average offer prices. Data also nets out short-term expiration purchase offers (offers for leases with 5 or fewer remaining years in the lease terms provide a pro-forma rent hike opportunity for the buyer).
Pricing for Wireless Leases – Trends – All Escalator types (ended 3/31/17):
TCA Commentary – Q1 – 2017:
– Q1 2017 prices for wireless leases showed a marked retrenchment by the remaining financial acquisition firms * operating in the U.S. domestic market for wireless lease/easements purchases. The strategic buyers ** of wireless leases continue to focus predominantly on the leases under their own towers and move their pricing as the market dictates for other tower ground and rooftop leases.
While smaller pools of family or private money have entered the market as well, we see them having done so with an overtly conservative approach seeking ‘needle in a haystack’ acquisitions of multi-tenant tower ground leases at low multiples. An influx of formerly employed originators from the financial acquisition firms has also increased the number of ‘brokers’ or intermediaries operating in the market offering to either advise sellers for a fee or seeking to broker their identified transactions to one of the portfolios for a fee.
Some of these former financial aggregation firms have become ‘straw’ buyers for the tower companies. This type of relationship may require the ‘straw’ buyer to sell the assets directly to your tenant after closing or assign the rights they have obtained to your tenant, thereby making promised revenue-sharing arrangements hollow at best. If there is a Right of First Refusal clause in your lease and someone other than your tenant is making an offer to buy it, a seller needs to understand that this buyer is almost certain to have a relationship with your tenant and will be ‘giving’ something to them to get them to waive their rights under this clause.
TCA cautions prospective sellers that offers by buyers to ‘share’ in rent increases above ‘scheduled rent’ at lease expiration or renewal should be viewed with suspicion or ignored when evaluating purchase price and structure, especially if there is a Right of First Refusal in your lease. Those transactions are highly likely to be favorably amended for the tenant by the buyer post closing.
The sale of most of the towers previously owned by AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon to the large public strategic tower companies created a furious ‘amendment and extension’ initiative by the tower companies as they attempted to lock-up the rent on leases that would expire in the near future and remove the possibility of the property owner negotiating a higher rent at lease expiration. Just as importantly, your new tower company tenant is very interested in obtaining Right of First Refusal (ROFR) clauses in leases that did not previously have them. This is done to prevent other firms from purchasing the leases and, in turn, looking to increase their rents.
Having a ROFR in a lease with a tower company tenant reduces the value of your lease because it also reduced the number of firms willing to make an offer to purchase it – leaving mostly the ‘straw’ buyers to make offers. ROFR’s in carrier leases are much less of a concern as they rarely exercise their ROFR rights.
* Financial aggregation firms are companies that acquire the assets with the intent of either just collecting the cash from the lease as is and holding it or, more often, firms that buy with the intention of ‘flipping’ to tower companies or into securitizations. Despite often requiring that they buy an expanded easement area with a ‘sharing’ arrangement back to the seller for any new tenants that come to the site, financial aggregation firms have little to no history of being able to ‘lease up’ a property. Note that Sellers should be very cautious of letting any financial buyer expand their easement as part of the purchase process. See the Recommendations for Sellers in the Lease Buyout section of TCA’s website.
** Strategic aggregation firms are companies that own and operate thousands of assets across the US and are capable of bringing additional tenants to a property that has their own tower on it.
Q1 2017 Developments and Commentary:
Tower Company entrance into the rooftop lease acquisition space – 2016 saw a significant increase in acquisitions of rooftop leases by at least one of the public tower companies. These purchases have been structured as ‘Master/Sub’ lease arrangements where rights to the entire rooftop and existing leases are purchased using a master lease structure and granting rights to the buyer to sub-lease to additional tenants on the property. Offers to share in the rent from additional tenants are usually part of the offered structure with 50/50 being a floor participation between Buyer and Seller. While many sellers ARE interested in having additional revenue put on their property that they can benefit from, TCA cautions sellers that any sale structured with the promise of additional rent down the road needs to be carefully reviewed. Financial buyers have no ability to bring tenants and the larger tower companies, with tens of thousands of sites across the U.S., almost always have their own towers nearby that would be much more profitable for them to place another tenant on vs. your rooftop. If you are seeking additional revenue, consider selling to a more nimble strategic buyer with fewer locations near your property. TCA recommends that property owners approached to sell the rights to their rooftop to any firm obtain professional advice. We would be pleased to review these offers for you, at no cost.
T-Mobile Consent Requirements – If a property owner ever wants to monetize their lease either for additional working capital or to de-risk the possibility of losing the revenue in any de-commissioning, etc. due to mergers among the carriers, we strongly recommend you find a way to eliminate any ‘consent to assign’ or ‘consent to sell’ from a T-Mobile lease. Removing it is NOT possible once the lease is established (why would they?) but if you are negotiating a new T-Mobile lease, it would very much benefit you to strike any such language. While T-Mobile has no history of purchasing their own leases back, our understanding is that they will only consent to a sale if the buyer gives them a sizable reduction in their rent and agrees to make it difficult to impossible for them to re-sell or re-finance the lease as part of their own portfolios. This results in much lower prices or, worse yet, a complete inability of the better capitalized buyers to make an offer on your lease at all.
AT&T Right of First Refusal buy-back initiative – Q1 of 2017 saw AT&T quietly announce the availability of a significant pool of capital to proactively purchase their own rooftop and ground leases from their landlords who are interested in lease monetization. This program was put in place to prevent both the landlords and AT&T from being taken advantage of by unscrupulous buyers. TCA is national partner of AT&T and we can explain the pros and cons of monetizing a lease if you are interested in this program.
TCA Activity and Offer Prices:
TCA offers remain ahead of initial offers from other aggregation firms and have an average approaching 179 x the monthly rent (15 x annual) over the last 6 months (normalized for 3% escalators and 99 year purchase terms).
Prices for 3 of the major tenants (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile) had remained undifferentiated until Q4 but a noticeable decrease in pricing is now being seen for Sprint sites and somewhat less for T-Mobile sites. This pricing reduction is likely in anticipation of a possible merger of Sprint and T-Mobile. The market for most other tenant-credits (e.g. Clearwire or Cricket for example) continues to remain void of purchasers.
Marketing Commentary: Tower Capital Advisors offers have remained ahead of most all buyers for our specific easement purchase structure and expanded easement purchase structures. Most, if not all, of our competitors attempt initially to buy an expanded easement – which means when and if the tenant needs more space on your roof or property or if new tenants want to come onto the property and need space, the buyer will get all or a portion of that future, unforeseen rent, without having done anything to deserve it. Note that no financial player in the market can ‘bring new tenants’ to a tower they don’t own nor to a rooftop. Ask for statistics and references from any buyer offering to bring new tenants to you and you are likely to agree.
TCA’s best-foot-forward offers still surpass the initial offers of all of the aggregation firms. TCA does not ‘start low’ and work our way up to match competitive bids. We do not believe that property owners looking to sell their leases should want to deal with buyers that initially try and take advantage of them and, in the face of competition, increase their offers after the fact. TCA has been able to keep ahead of the market with our offer prices after having entered into a facility arrangement with our institutional funding partner. TCA is not a ‘broker’ and we close directly onto the balance sheet of our funding partner. We would be pleased to arrange a call explaining the process of selling a lease with our closing and legal department at your convenience.
TCA’s objective in providing you and the public with this data is that we hope you will allow us to bid on your site when you choose to sell.
3/31/17 Update: Average Cap Rates offered by TCA for Wireless Leases.
Tower Capital Advisors announces a Sell-Side Advisory/RFP Service for property owners interested in monetizing their wireless leases:
There are times when TCA cannot provide an offer price that is truly reflective of the value of a wireless lease or when a municipal entity is required to run an open-market competitive bidding process by issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP). Tower Capital Advisors has assisted numerous sellers with this task, often in cases with leases that are expiring in the near-term (e.g. less than 10 years) and where the current rent amount may not reflect the value of the site to the tenant. We cannot urge you enough NOT to extend a lease that is about to expire without discussing it with us. The initiatives of the tower companies to extend leases on towers with multiple tenants on them are the most important to them – and there are buyers in the market that will absolutely pay MORE, not less, when a lease is about to expire. You should understand that value before signing any extension amendment!
In that regard, we have provided below our 2016 track record for these ‘Sell-Side Advisory’ services below. Note that in 2016, TCA has achieved an improvement of more than 31% above the initial ‘best offer’ from the tenant. Contact us today for more information.
2017 Expected Continued Trends and TCA’s Advise:
1. As noted above, with the acquisition of Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile’s towers by the public tower companies, a significant push is on to get the landlords (property owners) under these sites to sign extensions and amendments. One of the main purposes of this effort is to include Rights of First Refusal and other clauses in the amendment that can and will reduce the value of your lease if monetization is an objective. See the Recommendations for Sellers in the Lease Buyout section of TCA’s website.
2. Few, if any, players that aggregate with the intent of flipping a pool of assets for sale to a tower company or into a security and making a spread have survived 2016. As predicted, they were not able to keep up with competitive prices and sustain large organizations with high overhead. Working with TCA allows you to take the profit that otherwise would have been made by these firms for yourself.
3. Also as we predicted, the total number of industry buyers continues to contract with the loss of another financial aggregation firm and the move by other firms to ‘pure service’ providers. Those ‘services’ are likely to include working with the carriers or tower companies to contact landlords and effect rent reductions while obtaining Rights of First Refusal and Expanded Use clauses in any amendments. It might also include buying assets with the promise of sharing in ‘above scheduled rent’ only to sell the asset or assign the extensions to the tenant. TCA does not recommend Sellers sell to their tenants if they ever anticipate future upside from increased rent, and now you can include in that recommendation not selling to someone who, in turn, sells your lease back to your tenant.
4. The reduction in total true portfolio purchasers has resulted in a number of brokers/intermediaries entering the market. We do not feel that Sellers should retain brokers that they have to pay in this sector and can, either through direct contact with purchasers or by working through Buyer paid intermediaries, obtain better pricing without doing so. Additionally, TCA does not usually recommend the use of law firms or attorney’s that specialize in the wireless sector as any good real estate attorney can handle the type of documentation associated with these transactions on a more cost-effective basis. It is also unusual for a law firm to be compensated on a percent of purchase price basis. A Seller should want his attorney to be un-biased with respect to whether a transaction closes or not.
5. Continued move by the Fed to increase interest rates is expected and will, likely, result in further declines in offer prices.
6. Reiteration: Marketing caveat venditor (Seller Beware): Site Owners that sell for less than they should are sometimes sold on the promise of the buyer bringing additional tenants to their property. Many if not all of the financial aggregation firms offer ‘sharing’ arrangements for future revenue they claim they can bring to your site. In the case of cell towers (vs. rooftops), only the TOWER OWNER has anything to do with soliciting new tenants – so a pure-play financial buyer of your ground lease cannot do anything to bring more revenue to the property. In the case of both cell tower or rooftop installations, only the strategic firms and the carriers themselves determine where sites are needed and most if not all of the financial aggregators do nothing about marketing your property. Large cell tower companies offering to buy your rooftop may be conflicted with respect as to whether to put the next carrier on your property or on their tower, which would be more profitable. Bottom line: Don’t be fooled by groups that pitch you on how they will bring you more revenue down the road. Few firms actually even try and if it happens at all, it will be purely up to the carriers that need coverage in your area, not the buyer of your lease.
Effect of Interest Rates on Pricing for Wireless Leases – 2017 forecast:
As predicted, interest rates are rising and with them, the price for wireless leases WILL eventually decline. Take advantage of the currently high prices in 2017 if you are interested in selling. If you, as a prospective Seller, are interested in monetizing your lease, we believe now is the time to do it.
Get an offer from Tower Capital Advisors today and see how it compares to what you have been offered in the past.
Long Term History of Prices in the Wireless Lease Buyout Industry:
Aggregation firms have been contacting site owners for more than a decade to buy the rent they receive from cell phone / wireless carriers and tower companies on their property. These transactions are done either as easement and assignments or pure assignments of rents. The rents are purchased by these aggregator either in perpetuity (preferred) or for fixed periods of time ranging, typically from 20 to 50+ years. After the expiration of the rent assignment (for other than perpetual terms), the rents typically revert back to the property owner.
The prices in the industry are typically discussed from the aggregation firm’s perspective either in terms of multiples of the monthly rent amount being purchased (or for annually paid leases, monthly equivalent rent) or in terms of the yield they would obtain on the transaction if held for the term of the rent assignment.
Aggregation firms, by our definition, are privately financed companies that acquire the leases temporarily with an outlook towards a pool sale or a securitization finance exit.
Excluded from our definition of ‘aggregators’ are firms whose main business is operating towers (e.g. public tower companies) or firms that hold the assets in more permanent investment funds. While these firms are also incentivized to acquire the assets as inexpensively as possible absent making the purchases in a competitive environment, we do not consider them ‘flippers’ that act only as temporary homes for the assets.
Historical Pricing and Values of Wireless leases:
Over the last dozen years, structures for the purchase and prices for wireless lease assets have varied widely with significant upward pressure in recent months (but now declining). As the asset class has become more and more in favor on Wall Street, the prices to the site owner have increased due to competition among the aggregation firms. The price for pools of the assets has also risen. Despite this, there is a large disparity between what site owners are offered for their leases and what institutional investors and pool buyers are willing to pay. This difference represents the profit opportunity for an aggregation firm.
Note that 2013 data from the above chart was derived from Q1 only. Q2 and Q3 saw dramatic increases in these average offer prices with Q4 showing a drop back to reality. Note also that Seller’s working with TCA have continued to experience the highest offers in the industry.
Today, the most preferred structures (thus offering the best prices) are transactions that acquire the assets by taking a perpetual easement on the property whose footprint mirrors (or optimally expands) the footprint the carrier tenant has on the property as well as taking an assignment of the rent (in perpetuity). Aggregation firms will typically offer the property owner a sharing of any rent that comes in through expansion by existing tenants or addition of new tenants into their expanded easement area.
In 2012, across the spectrum of tenants and domestic markets, a typical lease (2) with one of the premier tenants (AT&T, Verizon) might have been purchased from a property owner by an aggregation firm for, on average, 120 X the monthly (or equivalent rent) for a 40+ year easement purchase. More recently, averages for these same leases have approached 140X or more. To simplify, that means if his/her current rent were $1000/month and if his/her negotiating skills were intermediate or better, a site owner selling his/her wireless rent for 40 or more years would have been offered $120,000 growing more recently to $150,000 for their lease or more.
Pools of these leases sold on a “whole-loan” basis to tower companies or infrastructure funds or securitized, are commonly known to execute at 15-16+ X annual rent. That equates to 180 X the monthly rent. Secondary trading in the securitized assets purportedly suggests these valuations to be even higher and TCA believes that securitization issuances of these ‘ground and rooftop wireless lease assets will be driven even higher (perhaps to 18X or more).
(2) A typical lease would have an original 5 year term with mandatory renewals every 5 years for 3 or 4 more terms of 5 years, be somewhere mid-stream in the overall term of the original lease and renewals thereof, would have 3% per year annual escalation rate and would be with an investment grade tenant credit counterparty.
Tenants, Bond ratings and Yields:
TCA provides a direct connection to a ‘hold’ institutional investor for your wireless lease:
TCA believes that a direct sale to a ‘hold’ investor such as our buyout pricing is based on can result in higher prices for property owners.
Disclaimer: Information is provided by TCA based on public available resources, personal experience in the industry acquiring and selling millions of dollars of these assets through Q1, 2013 and from frequent conversations with industry players. It is opinion, albeit experienced, and thus should not be solely relied on in deciding whether or not to sell your asset, how to sell your asset or to whom to sell your asset.
Please call us at (800) 675-0144, or e-mail us at email@example.com for more information on either our direct buyout programs or advisory services.
Registration is free. If you have a site, Register today and TCA will value your lease and the economics of any offers you have had. We may even have a better one for you.